MGM Resorts International sued the victims of a Las Vegas music festival mass shooting in an effort to block any potential compensation claims against it.
The owner of the Mandalay Bay hotel claims a 2002 federal statute wipes out liability for any company that adopts “anti-terrorism technology,” which it says it did. It asked a federal judge in Nevada for a declaration that the company isn’t liable.
After Stephen Paddock opened fire at festival goers from the Mandalay Bay hotel, killing 58 and wounding about 500, more than 2,500 individuals brought, or threatened to bring, lawsuits against MGM, the company said in its complaint, filed July 13 in Las Vegas federal court.
The casino operator argues that because it hired a company certified by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to provide security at the Route 91 Harvest Festival to “help prevent and respond to mass violence,” it complied with the Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act, which limits liability arising from mass attacks committed in the U.S. The law “precludes any finding against” MGM and other defendants and bars victims from targeting the companies’ insurance policies as well, according to the suit.
Robert Eglet, a Las Vegas-based lawyer for the shooting victims, told the Las Vegas Review Journal newspaper the suit was misfiled in federal court. Since MGM is incorporated in Nevada, lawsuits over the shooting must be heard in state court and the company’s countersuit amounted to a “blatant display” of judge shopping, he told the paper.
“The federal court is an appropriate venue for these cases and provides those affected with the opportunity for a timely resolution,” Debra DeShong, an MGM spokeswoman, said in a statement. “Years of drawn out litigation and hearings are not in the best interest of victims, the community and those still healing.”
The Las Vegas police commanders said Paddock shot the festival players from the windows from the 32nd-floor suite in Mandalay. The room was filled with more than 20 automatic weapons. Padok, 64, killed himself before the authorities could catch him. Among his victims were a US Navy sailor, a California firefighter and an officer in Las Vegas police officer.
The police did not determine the reason for Paddock to fire at the crowd.
The case, MGM Resorts International Inc. – Carlos Acosta, No. 18-cv-01288, Nevada State Court.
Legal warning !
The information, comments and suggestions there are not covered by investment advice. It is based on the author's personal opinions. These views may not fit your financial situation and risk and return preferences. For this reason, based solely on this information, investment decisions may not have the appropriate consequences for your expectation. Our Site is not responsible for any direct or indirect damages incurred by the investors as a result of the use of the information on the Site, deficiencies in the sources, damages incurred by profit, moral damages, or damage to third parties.