The state of Maine is locked in a legal battle with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and a pair of American Indian tribes about the way clean water standards apply in and around tribal lands.
Maine is arguing in the lawsuit that the EPA is unfairly imposing heightened water quality standards in the tribal areas. The state argues an EPA decision about the subject should be vacated because it exceeds the agency’s authority and is not based on scientific evidence.
The lawsuit has attracted the attention of Maine’s forest products and paper industries, because clean water standards play a role in industries’ ability to discharge material into rivers.
The lawsuit hinges on a disagreement between Maine and the EPA about the way to interpret rules about water quality standards. The state believes the standards apply the same everywhere in the state, including in tribal waters.
But the EPA has made the case that those standards, as they relate to pollutants in the water, are not strong enough – in part because the agency says Maine’s tribal sustenance fishers eat more fish than the population at large.
The Maine Attorney General’s Office considers the case a jurisdictional dispute that goes back nearly two decades, said Tim Feeley, a spokesman for the office.
“Maine’s water quality standards – the legacy of Senators Edmund S. Muskie and George Mitchell – are among the very best in the country, and we look forward to the end of this litigation so we can return to working constructively with EPA, our Tribal communities, and all our citizens to advance our mutual environmental and public health goals,” he said.
There is a schedule for the filing of court papers related to the case, and it stretches into next year, according to court documents. The case will then be in the hands of federal court, which will issue a ruling. The EPA is due to file a brief on the merits of the dispute July 30.
A spokeswoman for the EPA declined to comment because of pending court decisions. Two tribes have intervened in the lawsuit on the EPA’s behalf – the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians and the Penobscot Nation. Tribal representatives did not return phone calls from The Associated Press.
Many Maine municipalities are also watching, said William Taylor, an attorney who represents several such towns on the Penobscot and St. Croix rivers.
“They are imposing the new, more stringent human health criteria,” Taylor said. “So it’s a change, a significant change, and it could have significant costs for municipalities and industries.”
The Penobscot Nation, which gave one of Maine’s major rivers its name, has been involved in other court disputes over water stewardship in the past. The tribe sued Maine in federal court with a claim that the Penobscot River was part of its reservation, but lost in U.S. District Court in Maine. It then lost again in the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston last year.
Jerry Schwartz, senior director of the American Forest and Paper Association’s energy and environmental policy, said that whatever the court’s decision would do, it would have important consequences for industries producing paper products in the state. Said that Maine’s water quality standards are strong enough and should remain.
“EPA is coming and these standards are not approved,” he said. “They lead to unacceptable levels of permission and are extremely expensive to comply with.”
Legal warning !
The information, comments and suggestions there are not covered by investment advice. It is based on the author's personal opinions. These views may not fit your financial situation and risk and return preferences. For this reason, based solely on this information, investment decisions may not have the appropriate consequences for your expectation. Our Site is not responsible for any direct or indirect damages incurred by the investors as a result of the use of the information on the Site, deficiencies in the sources, damages incurred by profit, moral damages, or damage to third parties.